← All reviews

Moby-Dick; or, The Whale by Herman Melville

Moby-Dick; or, The Whale
Mo
Ebook

Contemporary Reviews of Moby-Dick; or, The Whale by Herman Melville

★★★★☆ 4.4/5 (6 reviews)
classic-fictionReleased 1851 6 reviews

Every great book is a door. Moby-Dick; or, The Whale by Herman Melville opens onto a world that has captivated readers across generations.

Read the Reviews →

About This Page

This page collects authentic reviews from original sources — the actual words of critics, reviewers, and commentators who examined Moby-Dick; or, The Whale when it first appeared. From periodicals and publications of the era, these reviews capture the real reactions, debates, and opinions that greeted this work when it was new.

Contemporary Reviews

Hot Take

Review of "Moby-Dick" — The Morning Advertiser

★★★★★ 5.0The Morning Advertiser·1851-10-24

To convey an adequate idea of a book of such various merits as that which the author of "Typee" and "Omoo" has here placed before the reading public, is impossible in the scope of a review. High philosophy, liberal feeling, abstruse metaphysics popularly phrased, soaring speculation, a style as many-coloured as the theme, yet always good, and often admirable; fertile fancy, ingenious construction, playful learning, and an unusual power of enchaining the interest, and rising to the verge of the sublime, without overpassing that narrow boundary which plunges the ambitious penman into the ridiculous; all these are possessed by Herman Melville, and exemplified in these volumes.

#
Critical Eye

Review of "Moby-Dick" — The Athenaeum

★★★½☆ 3.6The Athenaeum·Review by Henry F. Chorley·1851-10-25

This volume of Moby Dick may be pronounced a most remarkable sea-dish — an intellectual chowder of romance, philosophy, natural history, fine writing, good feelings, bad sayings — but over which, in spite of all uncertainties, and in spite of the author himself, predominates his keen perceptive faculties, exhibited in vivid narration. This is an ill-compounded mixture of romance and matter-of-fact. The idea of a connected and collected story has obviously visited and abandoned its writer again and again in the course of composition. The style of his tale is in places disfigured by mad (rather than bad) English; and its catastrophe is hastily, weakly, and obscurely managed. The result is, at all events, a most provoking book. Mr. Melville has to thank himself only if his horrors and his heroics are flung aside by the general reader, as so much trash belonging to the worst school of Bedlam literature.

#
Insightful

Review of "Moby-Dick" — The Spectator

★★★★★ 5.0The Spectator·1851-10-25

This sea novel is a singular medley of naval observation, magazine article writing, satiric reflection upon the conventionalisms of civilized life, and rhapsody run mad. The "marvellous" injures the book by disjointing the narrative, as well as by its inherent want of interest, at least as managed by Mr. Melville. Mr. Melville's mysteries provoke wonder at the author rather than terror at the creation; the soliloquies and dialogues of Ahab, in which the author attempts delineating the wild imaginings of monomania, and exhibiting some profoundly speculative views of things in general, induce weariness or skipping. The strongest point of the book is its "characters." Ahab, indeed, is a melodramatic exaggeration, and Ishmael is little more than a mouth-piece; but the harpooners, the mates, and several of the seamen, are truthful portraitures of the sailor as modified by the whaling service.

#
Scholarly

Review of "Moby-Dick" — John Bull

★★★★☆ 4.1John Bull·1851-10-25

Of all the extraordinary books from the pen of Herman Melville this is out and out the most extraordinary. Who would have looked for philosophy in whales, or for poetry in blubber? Yet few books which professedly deal in metaphysics, or claim the parentage of the muses, contain as much true philosophy and as much genuine poetry as the tale of the Pequod's whaling expedition. The flashes of truth which sparkle on the surface of the foaming sea of thought through which the author pulls his readers in the wake of the whale-ship, — the profound reflections uttered by the actors in the wild watery chase in their own quaint forms of thought and speech, — and the graphic representations of human nature in the startling disguises under which it appears on the deck of the Pequod, — all these things combine to raise "The Whale" far beyond the level of an ordinary work of fiction. It is not a mere tale of adventures, but a whole philosophy of life.

#
Notable

Review of "Moby-Dick" — The Illustrated London News

★★★★★ 5.0The Illustrated London News·Review by A.B.R.·1851-11-01

Herman Melville's last and best and most wildly imaginative story, "The Whale", will worthily support his reputation for singularly vivid and reckless imaginative power — great aptitude for quaint and original philosophical speculation, degenerating, however, too often into rhapsody and purposeless extravagance — an almost unparalleled power over the capabilities of the language.

#
Fresh Take

Review of "Moby-Dick" — The Literary World

★★★★★ 5.0The Nation·Review by Evert A. Duyckinck·1851-11-22

A new work by Herman Melville, entitled "Moby-Dick; or, The Whale", has just been issued, which, in point of richness and variety of incident, originality of conception, and splendor of description, surpasses any of the former productions of this highly successful author. Moby Dick is the name of an old White Whale; half fish and half devil; the terror of the Nantucket cruisers; the scourge of the distant oceans; leading an invulnerable, charmed life; the subject of many grim and ghostly traditions. This huge sea monster has a conflict with one Captain Ahab; the veteran Nantucket salt comes off second best; not only loses a leg in the affray, but receives a twist in the brain; becomes the victim of a deep, cunning monomania; believes himself predestined to take a bloody revenge on his fearful enemy; pursues him with fierce demonic energy of purpose; and at last perishes in the dreadful fight. Beneath the whole story, the subtle, imaginative reader may perhaps find a pregnant allegory, intended to illustrate the mystery of human life.

#

Why These Reviews Matter

These original reviews offer something no modern summary can: the authentic, unfiltered voice of the people who first encountered Moby-Dick; or, The Whale. They reveal what surprised, delighted, and sometimes disappointed the first audience. Whether you're a shopper, a scholar, or simply curious, these reviews give you the real story — straight from the source.

Key Takeaways

  • 6 authentic reviews from original periodicals. Including The Morning Advertiser, The Athenaeum, The Spectator, John Bull, The Illustrated London News, The Nation.
  • Published 1851 — these are the original critical reactions to Moby-Dick; or, The Whale by Herman Melville, not modern reinterpretations.
  • Primary source material for researchers, students, and anyone who wants the unvarnished truth about how this work was received.

Bottom line: If you want to understand how Moby-Dick; or, The Whale was truly received, read the original reviews — not someone else's summary.

More Reviews

Explore more reviews of other books:

Last updated: 1851-11-22